Bibliometric Analysis of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)-Based E-Module Research in Education from 2015 to 2025 Using VOSviewer
Keywords:
Bibliometrics, Educational Technology, E-module, HOTS, VOSviewerAbstract
Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) are essential competencies in 21st-century education, where e-modules serve as a crucial innovation in learning media. However, there is no comprehensive mapping covering research trends up to 2025. This study aims to analyze the bibliometric development of HOTS-based e-module research in education from 2015 to 2025. The research method employed is bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer software. Publication data were collected from the Google Scholar database via Publish or Perish. The results reveal a significant upward trend in publications over the last decade. Based on the network visualization, the major clusters connect e-modules to critical thinking, problem-solving, and digital literacy. The overlay visualization shows a shift in research focus from conventional module development to the integration of interactive technology and artificial intelligence in recent years (2023–2025). Density visualization identifies that e-module topics in Science and Mathematics are highly saturated, while research opportunities in the humanities and inclusive education remain widely open. In conclusion, HOTS-based e-module research continues to evolve dynamically and is increasingly integrated with the latest educational technologies.
References
[1] Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
[2] Arisandi, D., & Naryoso, A. (2020). Analisis bibliometrik penelitian teknologi pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 22(2), 154–167.
[3] Azhar, A. (2011). Media pembelajaran. Rajawali Pers.
[4] Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
[5] Daryanto. (2014). Pendekatan pembelajaran saintifik kurikulum 2013. Gava Media.
[6] Dwiyogo, W. D. (2018). Pembelajaran berbasis blended learning. Rajawali Pers.
[7] Fitriani, N., & Auliya, R. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi (HOTS) siswa dalam pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(3), 450–462.
[8] Google. (2026). Gemini (Version Feb 7) [Draft of educational technology journal]. https://gemini.google.com/app/223fb1fbaae9e10
[9] Hattie, J., & Donoghue, J. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. Science of Learning, 1, 16013. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13
[10] Indriyanti, F., Fauziah, T. N., & Nuryadin, A. (2023). Analisis bibliometrik penggunaan video pembelajaran di sekolah dasar tahun 2013-2022 menggunakan aplikasi VOSViewer. Jurnal Educatio, 9(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i1.4646
[11] Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative learning in 21st century. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 841–851. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201241
[12] Kurniawan, A. (2020). Tren penelitian teknologi pendidikan di masa pandemi: Analisis bibliometrik. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 7(2), 112–125.
[13] Kuswandi, D., Fadhli, M., Rahman Zh, M. H., Haditia, M., Sinaga, M. N. A., Thaariq, Z. Z. A., & Ardiansyah, A. (2025). Implementation of personalized approach in video editing learning to improve digital competency of 21st century learners.
[14] Mayer, R. E. (2019). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
[15] Nasution, S. (2022). Penerapan e-module berbasis HOTS untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(1), 45–58.
[16] Prastowo, A. (2015). Panduan kreatif membuat bahan ajar inovatif. Diva Press.
[17] Putra, P. S. (2019). Analisis bibliometrik penelitian pendidikan matematika di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 175–188.
[18] Rahman Zh, M. H., Kuswandi, D., & Fadhli, M. (2025). Flipbook vs presentation media: Revisiting empirical studies and literature review in Islamic education. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science, 6(3), 1793–1803.
[19] Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (2013). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2). Routledge.
[20] Sari, I. P., & Setiawan, A. (2021). Tantangan dan peluang riset media pembelajaran digital di era society 5.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi, 5(2), 88–101.
[21] Scopus. (2024). Bibliometric analysis tools and databases [Data set]. Elsevier.
[22] Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
[23] Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
[24] Suryani, N., Setiawan, A., & Putria, A. (2018). Media pembelajaran inovatif dan pengembangannya. Remaja Rosdakarya.
[25] Taufik, M. (2023). Integrasi artificial intelligence dalam e-module untuk pembelajaran berbasis HOTS. Jurnal Media Pembelajaran, 11(1), 10–22.
[26] Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
[27] Waluyo, T. (2021). Implementasi e-module interaktif untuk meningkatkan literasi digital siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Pendidikan, 11(2), 130–143.
[28] Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from 2010 to 2015: A structured literature review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(11), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i11.5959
[29] Zh, M. H. R., Sani, N. L., Kuswandi, D., & Fadhli, M. (2024). Needs analysis of development fbo media as a support for blended learning in al-qur’an hadits lesson. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 9(1), 16–32.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Naila Rahma Alya Adinda, Kurnia Adityarini Putri Handayani, Irfandi Maulana Firdaus, Maria Vernanda, Nayfa Aulia Az-Zahra, Nur Hafiza Kholistiyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Access
International Journal of Learning and Education (IJLE) is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users do not have to register to access the journal’s content. IJLE provides immediate open access to its content, without any embargo period. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, reuse or link to full text articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author as long as proper citation of the original publication is given. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative definition of open access.
Copyright and Licensing
The IJLE content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain unrestricted copyright and publishing rights of their articles. Authors grant the Publisher NAJAHA a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use or reuse the article freely as long as its original authors and citation details are identified.
Self-Archiving
IJLE allows and encourages authors to self-archive their articles on institutional or other specialized repositories, their personal websites and social-networking sites such as ResearchGate and Academia.edu. Authors are advised to use the final PDF version published on the Journal’s website for self-archiving purposes. However, it’s not an obligation and authors are free to use the version they prefere; pre-print, post-print or publisher’s PDF version.
There is no embargo on the self-archiving of articles. Authors are allowed deposition of articles on repositories, personal websites and social-networking sites immediately after publication on the journal website. Accepted manuscripts can be also self-archived by authors.
