Implementing Samsung Digital Technology in Pesantren Learning: A Qualitative Case Study of Adaptive Integration at Pondok Thursina
Kata Kunci:
Digital pedagogy; Islamic education; Pesantren; Samsung digital classroom; TPACKAbstrak
Digital transformation in education presents Indonesian pesantren, that is, Islamic boarding schools rooted in face to face transmission of religious knowledge through sorogan, bandongan, and halaqah, with both opportunity and tension. This qualitative case study examines how Pondok Thursina, a modern pesantren in East Java, integrates Samsung Digital Classroom technology while preserving its religious and communal identity. A single site embedded case study was conducted over five months (January to May 2026), drawing on twenty four nonparticipant classroom observations across general and religious subjects, semistructured interviews with eighteen informants (two kiai, eight ustadz, eight santri), and analysis of institutional documents and student digital artifacts. Data were analysed thematically using Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña’s interactive model, with trustworthiness ensured through source and method triangulation, member checking, peer debriefing, and a complete audit trail. Findings reveal four interrelated themes: (1) layered remediation that augments rather than replaces classical pedagogy; (2) emergent Digital Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Pesantren (DPCKP) cultivated through peer micromentoring; (3) cultural and spiritual content filtering through musyawarah and adab norms; and (4) structural tensions involving infrastructure, screen time governance, and asymmetric digital literacy among santri. The study advances the Pesantren Digital Integration Model (PDIM), extending Mishra and Koehler’s TPACK with two pesantren specific axes: spiritual and cultural alignment, and communal and spatial pedagogy. Findings inform Islamic education policy, EdTech vendors operating in faith based settings, and pesantren leaders pursuing digitisation without detraditionalisation.
Referensi
[1] Azra, A. (2019). Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi dan modernisasi di tengah tantangan milenium III (Rev. ed.). Kencana.
[2] Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 920317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317
[3] Apriyanti, N., Razak, R. A., Rahim, S. S. A., Shaharom, M. S. N., & Baharuldin, Z. (2023). Infographic instructional media as a solution for distance learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(2), 982–990. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.24112
[4] Bruinessen, M. van. (2012). Kitab kuning, pesantren dan tarekat: Tradisi tradisi Islam di Indonesia. Gading Publishing.
[5] Campbell, H. A., & Tsuria, R. (Eds.). (2022). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in digital media (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367277550
[6] Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
[7] Cuban, L. (2018). The flight of a butterfly or the path of a bullet? Using technology to transform teaching and learning. Harvard Education Press.
[8] Daryanes, F., Darmadi, D., Fikri, K., Sayuti, I., Rusandi, M. A., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2023). The development of articulate storyline interactive learning media based on case methods to train student’s problem solving ability. Heliyon, 9(4), e15082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15082
[9] Dhofier, Z. (2011). Tradisi pesantren: Studi tentang pandangan hidup kyai (Rev. ed.). LP3ES.
[10] Dito, S. B., & Pujiastuti, H. (2021). Dampak revolusi industri 4.0 pada sektor pendidikan: Kajian literatur mengenai digital learning pada pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jurnal Sains dan Edukasi Sains, 4(2), 59 to 65. https://doi.org/10.24246/juses.v4i2p59-65
[11] Fenwick, T. (2015). Sociomateriality and learning: A critical approach. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of learning (pp. 83–93). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473915213.n8
[12] Hefner, R. W. (Ed.). (2009). Making modern Muslims: The politics of Islamic education in Southeast Asia. University of Hawai‘i Press.
[13] Gourlay, L. (2021). There is no “virtual learning”: The materiality of digital education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.649
[14] Halstead, J. M., & Affouneh, S. (2022). Educating the human spirit in times of crisis: Digital transformation in Islamic religious education. British Journal of Religious Education, 44(3), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2021.1947194
[15] Heidari, E., Mehrvarz, M., Marzooghi, R., & Stoyanov, S. (2021). The role of digital informal learning in the relationship between students’ digital competence and academic engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 1154–1166. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12553
[16] Hirschkind, C. (2012). Experiments in devotion online: The YouTube khuṭba. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 44(1), 5 to 21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743811001218
[17] Husein, F. (2022). Digital Islam in Indonesia: The shift of ritual and religious authority. In I. R. Adi (Ed.), Borders and beyond (pp. 233 to 246). Routledge.
[18] Khoirurrijal, K., Sirojuddin, A., Fatimah, S., Aprilianto, A., & Sa’dullah, A. (2023). Pesantren digital transformation during and after the pandemic: A multisite study. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(1), 71 to 86. https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v9i01.7891
[19] Kasim, T. S. A. T., & Yusof, Y. M. (2023). Absorptive capacity and digital transformation in Islamic educational institutions: A systematic review. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 13(1), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.131.12
[20] Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
[21] Lukens Bull, R. (2020). Islamic higher education in Indonesia: Continuity and conflict. Palgrave Macmillan.
[22] Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
[23] Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76 to 78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611
[24] Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017 to 1054.
[25] Mursidi, A., Setiawan, F., Soegiyanto, S., & Nuryana, Z. (2024). Digital transformation in Islamic boarding schools: Challenges and institutional readiness. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2314512. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2314512
[26] Nasir, M. K. M., & Rijal, S. (2021). Cultivating an environment of moral teaching in the digital era. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1290–1297. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21743
[27] Nguyen, L. T., & Habók, A. (2024). Tools for assessing teacher digital literacy: A review. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(1), 305–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00257-5
[28] Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
[29] Phillips, M., Koehler, M., & Rosenberg, J. (2017). Looking outside the circles: Considering the contexts influencing TPACK development and enactment. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2017 (pp. 2476 to 2483). AACE.
[30] Pohl, F. (2009). Islamic education and the public sphere: Today’s pesantren in Indonesia. Waxmann.
[31] Prasetya, R., Hadi, S. P., & Wahyu, F. R. (2022). Digital transformation in Indonesian Islamic education: Opportunities and barriers. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 145 to 162.
[32] Putri, S. R., Wahyuni, S., & Suharso, P. (2021). The effectiveness of digital learning media on students’ learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(3), 412 to 419.
[33] Rahman, M. (2021). Digitalisasi pembelajaran di lingkungan pesantren modern. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 88 to 97.
[34] Salsabila, U. H., Sari, L. I., Lathif, K. H., Lestari, A. P., & Ayuning, A. (2020). Peran teknologi dalam pembelajaran di masa pandemi covid 19. Al Mutharahah: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 17(2), 188 to 198. https://doi.org/10.46781/al-mutharahah.v17i2.138
[35] Samsung Electronics. (2024). Samsung digital classroom: Teacher and administrator guide (v3.2). Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
[36] Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893 to 1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
[37] Schleicher, A. (2023). PISA 2022 results: The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.
[38] Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
[39] Sirry, M. (2020). Controversies in contemporary Islam. Routledge.
[40] Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
[41] Sutrisno, E., & Fauzan, M. (2022). Tantangan implementasi teknologi pendidikan di lembaga pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 33 to 41.
[42] Tan, C. (2014). Educative tradition and Islamic schools in Indonesia. Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies, 14, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.5617/jais.4638
[43] Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
[44] Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2016). Using theoretical perspectives in developing an understanding of TPACK. In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (2nd ed., pp. 33 to 52). Routledge.
[45] Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2022). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2057499
[46] Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134 to 152.
[47] Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Jimly Assiddiqi, Faris Khoirul Anam, Muhammad Fadhil Hadziq
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Access
International Journal of Learning and Education (IJLE) is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users do not have to register to access the journal’s content. IJLE provides immediate open access to its content, without any embargo period. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, reuse or link to full text articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author as long as proper citation of the original publication is given. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative definition of open access.
Copyright and Licensing
The IJLE content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain unrestricted copyright and publishing rights of their articles. Authors grant the Publisher NAJAHA a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use or reuse the article freely as long as its original authors and citation details are identified.
Self-Archiving
IJLE allows and encourages authors to self-archive their articles on institutional or other specialized repositories, their personal websites and social-networking sites such as ResearchGate and Academia.edu. Authors are advised to use the final PDF version published on the Journal’s website for self-archiving purposes. However, it’s not an obligation and authors are free to use the version they prefere; pre-print, post-print or publisher’s PDF version.
There is no embargo on the self-archiving of articles. Authors are allowed deposition of articles on repositories, personal websites and social-networking sites immediately after publication on the journal website. Accepted manuscripts can be also self-archived by authors.
